Glasgow, Scotland: Open Space Strategy

Living Green for Climate Change Icon Living Green for Health and Wellbeing Icon

City:Glasgow
Country:Scotland
2022 Awards:Entrant
Award Categories:        Living Green for Health and Wellbeing Icon
Connect:Website link icon

* This case study was written by the city and has not been edited by AIPH


Initiative: Glasgow’s Open Space Strategy

The Open Space Strategy (OSS) has been prepared in response to the requirements set out in Scottish Planning Policy (SPP) (2014), the National Planning Framework (NPF) 3 (2014) and the guidance set out in Planning Advice Note 65 (PAN 65): Planning and Open Space (2008). NPF3 identifies the Central Scotland Green Network (CSGN) as a national priority, aimed at transforming Central Scotland into a place where the environment adds value to the economy and where people’s lives are enriched by its quality. This OSS can play a significant role in delivering the aims of the CSGN in Glasgow.

In responding to these requirements, the Strategy reflects the specific circumstances of Glasgow. Documents such as the Council’s Strategic Plan 2017-2022 and the Glasgow Community Plan set out the key aspirations of the Council and its partners in relation to a wide variety of matters that the OSS can help to address, including enhancing health and wellbeing. The declaration of a Climate/Ecological Emergency in 2019 placed further emphasis on using open spaces effectively to reduce emissions and adapt to the impacts of a changing climate. Other influences have been considered, including legislation such as the Community Empowerment (Scotland) Act 2015.

Critically, the Strategy recognises that the wider ambitions set out in international, national, regional and local policies and strategies need to be considered in the context of shrinking public finances. Whilst this can have a direct impact on the Council’s ability to fund the upkeep and delivery of open space, it shouldn’t limit the City’s ambitions for securing as wide a range of public benefits as possible from open spaces. These include the statutory requirements to help deliver climate change adaptation and mitigation and international commitments such as the Aichi biodiversity targets of the Convention on Biological Diversity.

The wider ambition of the city for its Open Space strategy has been supported through its use as an exemplar within the H2020 Connecting Nature project and the City’s role as a front runner city. Key work has included the development of data sets to measure the impact of delivery against the desired outcomes relating to community cohesion; health & wellbeing; economy; environment & biodiversity. Well managed, designed and located open space can help enhance:

  • the health and wellbeing of Glasgow’s inhabitants;
  • the liveability of the City, increasing its attractiveness for people and investment
  • the resilience of the City, its people and biodiversity, to threats such as existing flood risk and climate change.

The strategy recognises the wider benefits that open space can bring to the City and its inhabitants. A new perspective on how it is funded and maintained is required to ensure these benefits are realised. Initial work started in the Open Space Strategy to create the GIS data layer of protected open spaces. The initial draft strategy was presented to committee in 2018 with the finalised version approved by committee in November 2019 and finally adopted as a Statutory Planning Document on 6th February 2020.

Green City Home Case Study Collection World Green City Awards AIPH Green City Briefings 2022/23

Contact


T: +44 (0) 1235 776230

E: greencity@aiph.org

Did you know?

Glasgow is the most populous city in Scotland and the fourth most populous in the UK

Addressing the urban challenge

Breadth of the issue – How are the problem(s) that are being tackled by your initiative affecting citizens/local businesses or a significant component of the local wildlife?

A robust impact assessment framework entails careful reflection and planning of monitoring and evaluation processes which pertain to the design of NBS. By definition, NBS are multifunctional. NBS assessment is central to evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of specific interventions against strategic city goals. The ultimate goal is to gather long-term solid evidence about NBS performance in urban contexts with reference to our wide-ranging social groups and communities. In turn, this evidence can support smart policy decisions and adaptive co-management aspects of NBS stewardship once installed, as well as enhance sustainability, wellbeing, and resilience in cities. Evaluating effectiveness of NBS interventions is also useful in developing cost-effective policies which support our work in advocating for more investment, including taking advantage of broader funding streams. The dashboard development has provided colleagues with visualised data for the first time, which allows them to know what’s available and to ask the right questions prior to starting work on initiatives. It is, therefore, almost a first step to making sure monitoring and evaluation takes place, by allowing access to traditionally ‘technical’ streams (e.g. spatial mapping, statistics, graphs) to planners within councils. Monitoring and evaluation processes advance the arguments as to the benefits that NBS can deliver and improve the evidence-base and data availability within urban planning.

Depth of the issue – How seriously are the problems being tackled by your initiative impacting the life of the citizens/businesses/wildlife concerned?

The design and development of the Impact Assessment Framework within the Connecting Nature project involved a comprehensive review of the existing grey and scientific literature on impact assessment in NBS, as well as a co-creation process with three European cities (Genk, Glasgow and Poznan). The different steps of this process that sought to identify the gaps between the research and the needs of the cities are summarised in four phases that can be consulted in Deliverable 1.1 of the project (Dumitru et al., 2019). These phases were:

  1. Comprehensive scoping of NBS projects in Europe
  2. Identifying most innovative emerging experiments involving nature-based solutions across Europe and their transformative elements
  3. Reviewing scientific literature, consultations with experts outside Connecting Nature and Indicators co-creation activities with FRCs
  4. Co-creation workshops with Front-runner cities to identify the suitability of the framework to evaluate their NBS

All these phases contributed to creating a robust Impact Assessment Framework based on the scientific evidence existing to date.

The dashboard development was brought about as a result of the lack of data availability for urban planners and the recruitment of a spatial analyst who was able to take advantage of new technologies. The dashboard’s limitations are around the topic of analytics, as it does not automate the data analysis process. However, this was never the intention of the dashboard, which was primarily created as a data visualisation tool for planners to get accustomed to data and start thinking about the necessity of ‘evidence-based’ decision-making.