The story of methyl bromide goes deeper

As long as there are no feasible alternatives, methyl bromide is still considered an important tool for eradicating or preventing the spread of some quarantine pests. The use of methyl bromide is strictly regulated at state levels. What is methyl bromide, what is its regulatory status and how to avoid and reduce the use of ozone-depleting substances such as methyl bromide?

Methyl bromide is a fumigant that was used widely for many decades, particularly as a soil fumigant, providing effective and reliable control of soil-borne pests, pathogens and weeds. It was particularly useful for high-cash crops like floriculture which are subject to loss from pests and diseases and regulated with stringent quality controls.

In 1992, however, methyl bromide was found to cause severe damage to the ozone layer and was labelled for phase-out under the United Nations Montreal Protocol. Industrialised countries were given until 2005 to cease use of the fumigant, whilst developing nations were granted an extra 10 years, until 2015.

Presently, only very specific uses are permitted under a “critical use exemption” requiring special permission from the Protocol after a thorough evaluation determines that no feasible alternatives exist. Since alternatives  have been found for the vast majority of previous uses of MB, this exemption is now limited to a very small range of uses.

But the story of methyl bromide goes deeper. At the time it was restricted, many countries concluded that there were no feasible alternatives for a diverse range of treatments aimed at preventing the introduction and spreading of quarantine pests. They theorized that unless alternatives providing the same efficacy as methyl bromide were found, disruption to international trade would occur if its use was not allowed.

Invasions by new (or quarantine) pests into a country or region can have serious adverse effects on agricultural production and even natural resources. Containing and eradicating a new pest is generally difficult, may be highly controversial and often incurs exorbitant expense.

Methyl bromide is still considered an important tool for eradicating or preventing the spread of some quarantine pests. It is relatively inexpensive and easy to use, well-known around the world and widely accepted by phytosanitary authorities as a reliable and efficacious treatment. Consequently, some countries still require imported goods to come treated with methyl bromide or apply treatment upon their arrival if quarantine pests are found or suspected.

Cut flowers are no exception to this. In fact, they often get treated when entering key import markets such as the USA, whenever an unwanted pest is found or suspected.

However, fumigation with ozone-depleting methyl bromide is undesirable. It is not only an added cost to the exporter, it also reduces the vase life of cut flowers and may diminish their quality.

Tips to avoid the use of methyl bromide

The use of methyl bromide should be avoided as much as possible! Following are some tips to achieve this: 

  • Harvest healthy flowers in the first place! If you have good health programs in place, the likelihood of sending infested flowers is significantly reduced.
  • Establish a pre-shipment inspection scheme at the postharvest stage. Train personnel in charge of grading and packing to check for pests. Set up a tracing system that will allow you to track the source of unwanted problems and take corrective action.
  • Liaise with plant health inspection authorities in the destination country. They will generally be amenable to sharing information on the specific pests intercepted, the flower types involved and how often this occurs. You will be able to trace problems to their origin, identify circumstances likely to lead to interceptions (e.g. climate, specific varieties, storage and packing conditions) and act accordingly.
  • Many countries, for example Australia, utlise a ‘systems approach’ as a means to ensure pest-free imported flowers. This entails incorporating a series of integrated pest management measures at different points along the production chain. This specific programme is approved by the importing and exporting countries and replaces MB fumigation. Members of the European Union will also accept this scheme, since methyl bromide has been banned in that region for all uses since 2010.
  • If you suspect or identify unwanted pests in flower consignments, consider a pre-shipment treatment with an alternative to methyl bromide. Phosphine, combined with cold temperatures, is emerging as a very efficient option. Bear in mind that like methyl bromide, phosphine is a powerful and highly toxic fumigant which should be applied with the utmost care.


↑ Back to top